JERUSALEM, 2nd Nov: Benjamin Netanyahu’s grip on power faces a serious test. Arab parties have signaled they could help Israel’s opposition form an alternative government, setting the stage for crucial coalition talks on November 4.
The numbers are tight. The political stakes are higher.
Israel’s latest election has produced a political deadlock, and the opposition is now looking beyond its traditional boundaries. Arab-led parties, which secured a record 19 seats in the Knesset, could become decisive players in the effort to replace Netanyahu.
The question is simple: Can Gadi Eisenkot turn opposition numbers into a functioning government?
The answer will depend on negotiations, political flexibility and whether the parties involved can agree on what comes next.
Israel Coalition Talks: The Numbers Behind the Deadlock
The October 27 election delivered a fractured mandate.
Netanyahu’s bloc secured 53 seats in the 120-member Knesset. The opposition bloc, led by Eisenkot, won 48 seats. Neither side came close enough to govern independently.
A parliamentary majority requires 61 seats.
That leaves both camps searching for partners. And this is where Arab-led parties enter the picture.
Arab parties representing Palestinian citizens of Israel secured 19 seats, their strongest showing on record. The Joint List won 11 seats, while Ra’am secured eight.
These numbers have transformed the coalition arithmetic.
The opposition cannot simply rely on its existing bloc. It needs additional parliamentary support, and Arab lawmakers could provide the difference between another Netanyahu government and a new political arrangement.
Gadi Eisenkot’s Challenge to Netanyahu
Eisenkot, who leads the Yashar party, has argued that the election delivered a clear public mandate for change.
On October 31, he said voters had backed change by a margin exceeding 500,000 votes.
His message was direct: the parliamentary majority opposed to Netanyahu must be used immediately.
Eisenkot has also left the door open to lawmakers willing to accept his conditions. According to his position, any lawmaker who agrees to those requirements could become a partner.
That approach could broaden the opposition’s reach. But it also means political allies must agree on fundamental questions about Israel’s identity, security and public responsibilities.
Four Conditions That Could Shape the New Government
Eisenkot has outlined four conditions for potential partners.
1. Recognising Israel’s political identity
He demands recognition of Israel as a Jewish, democratic, liberal and egalitarian state.
2. Upholding the Declaration of Independence
Potential partners must support Israel’s Declaration of Independence.
3. National or civilian service for all citizens
Eisenkot wants military, national or civilian service to be required of every citizen.
4. Dismantling Hamas’s capabilities
He insists that Hamas be recognised as a terrorist organisation and that its military and governing capabilities in Gaza be dismantled.
These conditions are not minor details. They define the framework Eisenkot wants for a new government.
The challenge is whether Arab parties can accept the framework while maintaining their own political positions.
Arab Parties Signal Willingness to Support Change
Ra’am leader Mansour Abbas has indicated that Eisenkot’s conditions would not prevent his party from joining a government, according to Israel’s Channel 12.
That statement matters because Ra’am holds eight seats. Its willingness to participate could give the opposition a path toward a parliamentary majority.
The Joint List has also signaled readiness to help.
Ahmad Tibi, leader of Ta’al, one of the Joint List’s three factions, said the alliance was prepared to support an alternative government from outside the coalition.
He urged Eisenkot to accept Arab parliamentary backing.
There is a distinction here. Supporting a government from outside the coalition is not the same as joining it. Still, parliamentary support could prove decisive when the numbers are this close.
A Difficult Choice for Arab Lawmakers
The political calculations are not straightforward.
Before the election, Tibi acknowledged that the next government would not be a “peace government.”
His assessment was blunt: “But we are choosing between the bad and the worse.”
That statement captures the dilemma facing Arab parties.
They are being asked to support an alternative government despite differences over national identity, military service and the conflict in Gaza.
At the same time, refusing to engage could leave Netanyahu’s bloc with another opportunity to form a government.
The negotiations will test whether parliamentary cooperation can overcome ideological disagreements.
Isaac Herzog’s November 4 Deadline
President Isaac Herzog is preparing to begin coalition consultations after receiving the official election results.
On November 4, Central Elections Committee chairman Justice Noam Sohlberg is expected to present the results to Herzog.
The president has already urged party leaders to accept the election outcome and demonstrate flexibility.
On November 1, Herzog warned that entrenched positions could push Israel toward another election.
The candidate assigned to form a government will receive 28 days to complete the task. A possible 14-day extension could follow.
If the attempt fails, other lawmakers may get an opportunity to form a government. If those efforts also collapse, Israel could face another election.
What Happens Next?
Israel coalition talks now revolve around a narrow parliamentary path.
The opposition has a chance to challenge Netanyahu, but the numbers alone will not produce a government. Eisenkot must secure enough support while navigating conditions that could complicate negotiations.
Arab parties have signaled openness. Ra’am has indicated that Eisenkot’s conditions are not an automatic barrier, while the Joint List has offered the prospect of support from outside a coalition.
That is a significant opening. Whether it becomes a government depends on what happens around the negotiating table.
For now, Netanyahu’s position is under pressure, but his political future is not settled.
The next phase begins on November 4. And with no bloc holding 61 seats, every parliamentary partner could matter.

Any Comments?